MICRO NUKES a Possibility WTC Atomisation.
The horrifying truth:
An anonymous physicist has claimed that numerous mini or micro nukes were used to destroy the WTC.
Whether you believe it or not is totally irrelevant.
A brief statement from SideWallFusion prior to the article on micro nukes.
If the official story is to be believed then the WTC towers collapsed under the force of gravity from top to bottom. No other force at all, just gravity.
Let us look at the facts.
In this picture two thirds of one of the towers has disappeared into the dust cloud which clearly shows the concrete construct being pulverised into a fine dust along with everything else in the building being lesser than steel.
At the same time huge steel girders were being flung upwards and outwards into the surrounding area, some being embedded into adjacent buildings. Pulverised bone fragments of unfortunate victims are also being found on the rooftops of adjacent buildings hundreds of meters away. Dust inches thick from the atomisation of these buildings covered the area around The WTC for up to two miles radius. While at street level there were parked vehicles that were scorched and melted on just one side, the side facing the buildings, the other side of these same vehicles remaining in tact.
OK, there are the facts, does a falling building collapsing under it’s own weight create these conditions? Is the official account right?
The official account is actually an insult to the intelligence of even the most ordinary citizens of the world. This undoubtedly gives us a picture of how the powers view the impotent and powerless populations they are endeavouring to control. Lets face the facts, those in control of the justice system are terrified of the real terrorists, bought and enslaved they remain deafening in their silence.
The controllers really couldn’t give a damn just what we ordinary folk think, they have an agenda and they are inexorably working towards it. Making fortunes from insider trading, the destruction of financial records, and securing corrupt security contracts along the way.
If micro nukes were used along with space based energy beams then we are facing an organisation that has already got the world in the palm of its hand, embezzling public funds to the tune of trillions of dollars to fund research and development into technological weapons of mass destruction. This scenario is a fact and bearing this fact in mind then the imagination is the only limit as to what they have hidden away under the cloak of cosmic secrecy ensured by their ruthless murdering of whistle blowers.
A condensed history of the development and legislation regarding these enigmatic weapons taken from The WTC Demolition Blogspot.com
There may appear to be a conflict between the “official” listing of minimal critical masses for small nuclear fission bombs, and the claims of very small yield for such nuclear devices. Now we have sources, like this Wiki article state that about 10 kg. (kilogram) for Plutonium, and 15-50 Kg for Uranium are their minimal critical masses.
I have seen other sources put 2 Kg for the minimal critical mass for Plutonium. At the same time, we have a gov’t physicist at a Congressional hearing, in 1998, who said, “These experiments involve the actual testing of extremely low yield fission devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT) within a confined environment.” Such a very small fission yield directly implies a critical mass far below that claimed to be the minimal critical mass for any fission device; thus there appears to be a conflict. How can it be resolved?
Obviously one or the other side may be lying. The official listings and equations for finding the smallest critical mass for a given radionuclide can have been made much larger than they really are—ostensibly to deter nuclear proliferation among “newcomers.” Or the physicist testifying to Congress could have lied to scare people.
Although the Congress did pass legislation barring the production of such extremely small yield nukes. Needless legislation was passed, if this were impossible; but this doesn’t prove anything, due to the nature of Congress.
Now regarding mini-nukes, as far back as the 1950’s, the USA had the Davy Crockett mini-nuke (fission). It was called a recoilless rifle with a range of 2-4 km. It’s yield was down to 10 tons of TNT. This is 0.01 Kt (kilotons), or about 1/1000 of the Hiroshima blast.
Thus it can be called a mini-nuke. Note that this low yield appears to be from less than the “official” minimal critical mass claimed. One would think that with an additional 45 years before 2001, and with the advent of technological breakthroughs, such as nanotechnology–which the military would have had decades before civilian use–ultra-small nukes would be obtainable, unless truly forbidden by the Laws of Physics.
Source: The WTC Demolition Blogspot.com
The FBI polygraphers will clean-up this mess.
Google “Quadri-Track ZCT”